The Power of Art last night
I watched the two episodes of the PBS show that were broadcast last night. On the whole, I prefer the book. The first, on van Gogh, was beautifully filmed and I loved the closeups of juicy mounds of wet paint being attacked by a brush. But there was a little too much of wind blowing in the wheatfields and shadows in unknown places and the actor playing Vincent tended to mumble his words (or maybe that's my hearing). I didn't get any of the passion of van Gogh. Schama as narrator of his own book was fairly good, but a little arch at times (and maybe that's just my perception). The Picasso segment was very informative on the history of the Guernica painting and I enjoyed seeing various stages of that great work. But again, a little too much TV art with bullfights and mysterious shadowy profiles of an actor puffing a cigarette or cigar and presumed to be Picasso. Both episodes were really quite beautiful, but I guess I expected something a little different. I'll watch the remaining programs in a different frame of mind.
Check out Charley Parker's blog on the Power of Art broadcast. He has images and links to other information about the program.
Check out Charley Parker's blog on the Power of Art broadcast. He has images and links to other information about the program.
Labels: picasso, theo van gogh
1 Comments:
And I thought it was just me, being cynical. While the first time I like the big blobs of paint being stirred, it got to feel like a time filler. Why not more looks at the painting? Or maybe each painting only needs a half hour? I will try the next episodes, partly because my art history knowledge is a little lacking. But maybe I should look for the book.
Post a Comment
<< Home